Out of Africa: India as the First Stop

Genetic Evidence of Early Settlement in India

The early modern humans who left Africa likely made their initial stop in India, where the first diversifications of mitochondrial and Y chromosome lineages outside of Africa are found. Genetic evidence suggests that these pioneering populations carried with them the ancestral lineages that would eventually spread across Asia and beyond. In terms of mitochondrial DNA, the M and N lineages from Africa are still prevalent in India today. The M lineage is particularly common, accounting for approximately 60% of the Indian mtDNA pool, and its mutations are older than those found in more eastern regions, suggesting that India was settled soon after leaving Africa. Recent high-resolution studies of the Indian population have placed the "southern route" migration as the source of haplogroup M, with coalescence estimates for Indian haplogroup-M haplotypes dating to approximately 48,000 ± 1,500 years. The deep roots of M phylogeny clearly establish the antiquity of Indian lineages, with specific sub-haplogroups such as M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M18, and M25 being exclusive to the Indian subcontinent.

On the Y chromosome side, early male lineages gave rise to various offshoots that are specific to the Indian subcontinent. Research has identified haplogroups H, L, and R2 as the major Indian Y-chromosomal lineages that occur both in caste and tribal populations and are rarely found outside the subcontinent. These genetic markers support the idea that the first settlers took a southern route out of Africa, as these offshoots would also be expected in the Levant if they had taken a northern route. Coalescence times suggest early Late Pleistocene settlement of southern Asia and indicate that there has not been total replacement of these original settlers by later migrations. Additional paternal lineages, including haplogroups C, F, H, L, and R2, are considered the minimal set of Y-chromosome lineages indigenous to India.

The genetic distinctiveness of India's earliest populations is further emphasized by the fact that high frequencies of M haplogroup are found among South Indian populations, whereas N haplogroup is found to be high among North Indian populations. This geographic differentiation reflects the ancient settlement patterns and subsequent population movements within the subcontinent.

Two Distinct Paths of Migration

In India, two distinct paths of migration emerged. One group followed the coastlines, gradually expanding eastward through regions like Australia, China, and Japan. This coastal migration represented a rapid dispersal along the southern rim of Asia, taking advantage of marine resources and relatively uniform coastal environments. The other group moved inland in a northwesterly direction, passing through Iran and Turkey, and eventually engaging with Neanderthals as they entered Europe. Both paths tested the abilities of early humans to adapt, innovate, and survive in challenging environments.

These divergent migration routes reflect the remarkable adaptability of early modern humans, who successfully colonized environments ranging from tropical coastlines to temperate inland regions. The coastal route, in particular, would prove to be one of the most significant human dispersals in prehistory, ultimately leading to the settlement of Southeast Asia, Australia, and the Pacific Islands.

Southeast Asia and the Lost Continent of Sunda

Early Human Presence in Southeast Asia

The coastal migration led to the exploration of the lost continents of Sunda and Sahul. The region of Southeast Asia (SEA) has a rich history of human habitation dating back nearly 2 million years, with the arrival of Homo erectus, known as "Java Man." Recent research indicates that Homo erectus reached Java and dwelled at Sangiran, Java, at least approximately 1.4 million years ago and more probably around 1.8 million years ago. This makes the Southeast Asian archipelago one of the earliest regions outside Africa to be inhabited by hominins.

Archaeological findings from various sites suggest that anatomically modern humans could have been present in SEA around 50,000 to 70,000 years ago. The Tam Pa Ling cave in northern Laos has yielded several modern human fossils dating to between 46,000 and 70,000 years ago. More recent discoveries have uncovered fossilized human bone fragments aged up to 86,000 years, suggesting modern humans were in mainland Southeast Asia earlier than previously thought. The human fossils discovered at Tam Pa Ling were deposited in the cave between 86,000 and 30,000 years ago, providing a crucial window into the early presence of Homo sapiens in the region.

Callao Cave on Luzon in the Philippines has provided evidence of human presence dating to approximately 67,000 years ago. Direct dating of a human third metatarsal using U-series ablation has provided a minimum age estimate of 66.7 ± 1 thousand years, making it the oldest known human fossil in the Philippines. Subsequent discoveries at Callao Cave have revealed a previously unknown species of archaic human, Homo luzonensis, identified from 50,000 to 67,000-year-old fossils.

Niah Cave in Sarawak, Borneo, has demonstrated human occupation from approximately 50,000 years ago until the present, representing one of the longest continuous sequences of human occupation in the region. The interdisciplinary investigation of the archaeology and palaeoecology of the Niah Caves has assembled a 50,000-year record of Homo sapiens' interactions with rainforest on the coastal lowlands of Borneo. Today, Southeast Asia is home to approximately 600 million people and is characterized by its cultural, linguistic, and genetic diversity.

The Formation and Submergence of Sundaland

During periods of low sea levels in the past, the southern part of the Eurasian continent was connected to islands like Sumatra, Java, Bali, and Borneo, forming an extended landmass called Sundaland or Sunda. The landmass was connected by significant land bridges during the last glacial maximum, which peaked around 20,000 years ago. Over time, Sundaland was affected by three major sea-level rises, occurring around 14,000, 11,000, and 8,000 years ago. These events led to a sea-level rise of approximately 120 meters, shaping the present-day geographical map of Southeast Asia.

Rising sea levels since the Last Glacial Maximum, some 20,000 years ago, have drowned the Sunda Shelf and generated the complex coastal morphology seen today. This dramatic transformation of the landscape would have had profound implications for the human populations inhabiting the region, forcing migration, adaptation, and cultural change.

These changes in climate and geography had significant effects on the flora, fauna, and likely the migration patterns of prehistoric humans within the SEA region. The submergence of vast areas of low-lying coastal plains would have reduced available territory, while the creation of thousands of new islands would have isolated populations and promoted genetic and cultural differentiation.

Theories of the Peopling of Southeast Asia

Two main theories about the peopling of Southeast Asia have been debated for some time. Both theories acknowledge that the initial migration into the region consisted of descendants from the first humans who left Africa around 60,000 to 70,000 years ago. However, the theories diverge from there.

One theory proposes that the Hòabìnhian culture, the original hunter-gatherers who settled Southeast Asia about 44,000 years ago, gradually transitioned into a farming society. This model suggests cultural continuity and independent development of agricultural practices by indigenous populations. The other theory suggests that farmers from present-day China, arriving about 4,000 years ago, displaced the Hòabìnhians. This "two-layer" model proposes population replacement rather than cultural continuity.

However, neither of these theories can fully explain the significant genetic diversity found in Southeast Asia today. Ancient DNA studies have revealed that the reality is far more complex, involving multiple migrations, admixture events, and regional variations.

Four Distinct Migrations Revealed by Ancient DNA

The studies on ancient DNA from human remains, including teeth and bones, dating back thousands of years, proposed that the genetic diversity in Southeast Asia resulted from four distinct migrations.

The first migration brought descendants of the earliest humans who left Africa, settling in Southeast Asia around 40,000 years ago. These populations, represented archaeologically by the Hòabìnhian culture, were hunter-gatherers who adapted to the diverse environments of the region. Ancient DNA analyses have shown that both Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers and East Asian farmers contributed to current Southeast Asian diversity.

The second migration involved farmers from China about 4,000 years ago, introducing rice cultivation. These agricultural populations brought new technologies, social structures, and genetic lineages that would transform the region.

A third migration occurred from Taiwan, spreading Austronesian languages across Southeast Asia around 4,000 years ago, supported by archaeological evidence and distinct Austronesian genetic markers. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis has allowed researchers to reconstruct a history of early Austronesians arriving in Taiwan approximately 6,000 years ago, spreading rapidly to the south, and leaving Taiwan about 4,000 years ago to spread throughout Island Southeast Asia, Madagascar, and Oceania. A Taiwan origin for the expansion of the Austronesian languages and their speakers is well supported by linguistic and archaeological evidence.

The fourth migration, introducing a new East Asian genetic component, coincided with the expansion of the Han Chinese Empire and centered in northern Vietnam.

Genetic analysis has demonstrated that the Hòabìnhians and migrating farmers interbred, contributing to the genetic diversity of present-day Southeast Asians. The study's findings challenge previous theories and provide valuable insights into the complex genetic history of the region. Present-day Malaysian Negritos, for example, can be modeled as an admixture of ancient Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers and Neolithic farmers. Malaysian indigenous people originated from at least three distinct ancestral populations related to the Hòabìnhian hunter-gatherers, Neolithic farmers, and Austronesian speakers.

Wallacea: The Island Stepping Stones to Sahul

Geography and Biogeography of Wallacea

Sahul consisted of Australia, New Guinea, and Tasmania connected due to lower sea levels during the last glacial maximum. Between Sunda and Sahul, these regions are separated by the Wallacean Archipelago's 17,000 islands. No land bridges connected these islands over time, and deep ocean trenches separated them from nearby Oceania.

Wallacea is a biogeographical region in the central part of the Malay Archipelago. It includes islands like Sulawesi, the Moluccas, and the Lesser Sunda Islands. The region is named after the British naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace, who independently formulated the theory of evolution through natural selection around the same time as Charles Darwin.

Wallacea is known for its unique and diverse flora and fauna, as it represents a transitional zone between Asian and Australian ecosystems. The region's isolation has led to the development of distinct species and ecosystems. This area has attracted significant attention from scientists studying human migration, as it played a crucial role in the movement of early humans across the islands during periods of lowered sea levels. Wallacea's geography and its potential impact on human migration have been subjects of research and speculation.

The Remarkable Sea Crossings to Sahul

The oldest dates for human occupation on the Sahul represent the earliest, indirect evidence for sea faring by early modern humans anywhere in the world, as the islands directly to the north and west of Sahul (Wallacea) were never connected to the mainland, requiring multiple successful water crossings east from mainland Southeast Asia. These ancient humans had to cross a significant barrier, a 60-mile-wide channel between Sunda and Sahul, which would have required advanced seafaring skills. The presence of forest fires or bird migrations may have indicated the presence of land, guiding these early explorers.

The peopling of Sahul from the islands of Wallacea involved two main possibilities: a northern route through Sulawesi into New Guinea, and a southern route through Bali, Timor and thence onto the expanded shelf of northern Australia. Both routes have been debated extensively in the archaeological literature.

In terms of the routes from Sunda to Sahul, early evidence of humans exploiting marine resources outside Africa comes from caves on both sides of the Lydekker Line - Barrow Island and East Timor. Similar aged molluscan remains have been found in other locations like Niah Cave on Borneo.

Around 50,000 to potentially 65,000 years ago, Anatomically Modern Humans rapidly spread across the modern Southeast Asia due to lower sea levels. They then crossed the islands of Wallacea to reach Sahul. Genetic evidence suggests they moved from Wallacea to Sahul in a single event, consistent with archaeological findings. The chances of accidentally reaching Sahul (Australia and nearby islands) by sea were very low unless an unrealistic number of people were involved.

The northern route is more likely for successful migration, but accidental colonization is unlikely. The fact that neither Homo erectus nor large mammals managed to reach Sahul over a long period suggests that intentional and directed voyaging was necessary. Evidence also indicates that a substantial initial population was needed to avoid extinction on Sahul.

This migration was a remarkable feat for several reasons. Firstly, it required advanced maritime skills to navigate the waters between islands. Secondly, the migrants had to adapt to new environments, including unfamiliar plants and animals, as they settled on each new island or continent. Lastly, this migration occurred tens of thousands of years before the settlement of the Americas, making it an early and significant human movement.

Northern vs. Southern Routes

The archaeological and geographical considerations related to the routes taken by early humans from the Sunda region to Sahul through Wallacea highlight two potential routes: the northern route and the southern route.

The northern route is suggested to pass through the northern part of Wallacea. It is favored due to shorter distances between islands. Intervisibility has been identified along this route, both shore-to-shore, though sea-to-shore visibility might have been absent between Timor and Sahul during that time. However, it's suggested that early mountaineers on Timor might have been able to determine the direction of islands not visible from the shore, aiding in navigation. The greater connectivity between islands in the northern route supports higher intervisibility and the likelihood of a northern landing location.

Looking at the effort and time needed for a successful journey, the northern route was easier and more likely to lead to a viable population in Sahul. The northern route involved only three crossings after reaching Sulawesi, and if the first travelers picked good conditions, each crossing could have taken 2–3 days. In this route, they could see the destination island throughout the journey, making navigation much simpler. From Sulawesi through islands like Obi or Seram, eventually reaching the Bird's Head region of New Guinea.

However, there isn't much archaeological evidence for these islands, especially in the eastern part. Sulawesi has been studied extensively by archaeologists, and some of the oldest evidence for humans in this region was found nearby. But as researchers move east, there's less information.

The southern route is suggested to cross between Timor and Australia. This route involved longer journeys with lower chances of success, even under the best conditions. Additionally, the islands in Sahul Banks were visible from high points about 10 kilometers away from the coasts of Timor and Roti, but not directly from the coast itself. This means that using the southern route would have required the ability to plan and carry out longer voyages over the open sea.

Humans arriving in Sahul accidentally is unlikely. Instead, the successful settlement of Sahul required multiple well-coordinated voyages by hundreds of individuals over a relatively short span of several centuries. It's also likely that intentional voyages were taken through multiple routes by different populations. The fact that these populations were already genetically distinct indicates that structured populations existed in Southeast Asia before the initial peopling of Sahul.

The palaeogeography of the Wallacea Archipelago is a significant factor in understanding early modern human colonization of Sahul, and models of colonization patterns, as well as archaeological survey and site interpretation, are all heavily dependent on the specific palaeogeographic reconstruction employed. Recent genomic models for the settlement of northeast Sahul, considering one or two migrations from Wallacea, reinforce the idea that ancestral groups to New Guinean and Indigenous Australians split early, potentially during their migration in Wallacea where the northern route could have been favored.

Computer Modeling of Migration Routes

Researchers have used computer modeling to reconstruct ancient geography and identify the most likely migration paths. Around 65,000 years ago, when the sea level was lower and visibility between islands was good, researchers reconstructed the ancient geography. They imagined the Sunda coastline going down the east coast of Borneo, reaching Java and Bali, and then curving back west. Using a computer model, they found the best path people might have taken during that time.

This path started near Balabalagan islands and went to Misool Island. The model suggested slightly different paths depending on how easy it was to travel by sea. One path went through islands like Obi and Kofiau, while another went through Buru and Seram islands. The path through the Peleng Islands and Sula Island group also varied slightly. The model didn't support the southern route. Even if they changed the starting points, the paths through Wallacea remained the same. This research didn't consider a route through modern Tiwi islands.

Around 70,000 years ago, the sea level was higher, and the Sunda coastline was different. The models showed that there might have been another possible route through the Nusa Tenggara archipelago, starting from the southern tip of Sumatra and passing through Timor and other islands before reaching Sahul. However, the main path was still similar to the one at 65,000 years ago, starting from Bangka Island and reaching Sahul through a similar route.

Genetic Admixture with Archaic Hominins

Ancestral populations in Australasia, including early Melanesians and Australian Aboriginals in Sahul (Australia, New Guinea, Tasmania), separated from a Eurasian population due to a combination of adaptations, genetic drift, and interbreeding with archaic hominins that had previously left Africa. As these populations migrated eastward, they encountered and sometimes interbred with other hominins already living in the eastern regions.

This biological mixing transformed the genetics of the earliest human migrants to Oceania. Within their genetic diversity, almost 3–4% comes from an extinct hominin, the Denisovan, which might have settled Sahul before modern humans. The distribution of Denisovan genomic signals is markedly uneven, with the highest concentrations found east of Wallace's Line, one of the world's most notable geographic barriers for faunal dispersion.

At least three different Asian hominin groups appear to have been involved in interbreeding events, including Denisovans. Several interbreeding events are inferred to have taken place east of Wallace's Line, the major biogeographical barrier in Island Southeast Asia. These findings are consistent with archaeological evidence of widespread and early hominin presence in the area and suggest that isolated Denisovan groups inhabited different islands across Island Southeast Asia, likely as a result of sea-level fluctuations during interglacial periods.

Later waves of Homo sapiens into Asia didn't hybridize with archaic hominins because they arrived after the extinction of groups like the Denisovans. This biological and cultural transformation during the colonization of Sahul and Near Oceania distinguishes these early migrants from later ones to the region.

The Settlement of Sahul and Australia

Early Human Arrival in Australia

Archaeological evidence indicates that humans arrived in Australia around 50,000 to 60,000 years ago. Rock shelter sites in Arnhem Land provide some of the earliest evidence of human presence, with artifacts dating back to this period. The site of Madjedbebe (formerly known as Malakunanja II) is a sandstone rock shelter in Arnhem Land, in the Northern Territory of Australia, possibly the oldest site of human habitation in Australia, with occupation dating to at least 65,000 ± 6,000 years ago. Along with Nauwalabila I, these sites are among the oldest in terms of human settlement in Australia, with estimated ages greater than 50,000 years.

Skeletal remains, such as the individual known as WLH3 from Lake Mungo, offer insights into the physical characteristics of these ancient people. WLH3's spherical head shape, high forehead, and other features show a modern appearance. Lake Mungo 3 is the oldest (Pleistocene) "anatomically modern" human from whom DNA has been recovered. The mtDNA from this individual belonged to a lineage that only survives as a segment inserted into chromosome 11 of the nuclear genome, which is now widespread among human populations.

The colonization of Australia likely began shortly after humans reached its shores, and evidence from various sites across the continent suggests initial occupation dating to more than 45,000 years ago. These early settlers adapted to a variety of ecosystems, including deserts, grasslands, woodlands, coasts, and alpine areas. The evidence suggests a single phase of colonization and long-term genetic isolation, as subsequent arrivals had limited impact on the overall gene pool due to the already established and widespread population. This gradual dispersion and adaptation to diverse environments shaped the physical and cultural variation seen in the Australian archaeological and biological records.

Environmental Impact and Megafauna Extinction

The sediment cores from Lynch's Crater in northeast Australia reveal important information about the environment and human impact. Around 41,000 years ago, there was a decline in large herbivores, indicated by reduced Sporormiella spores, which are linked to the presence of these animals. Researchers found that Sporormiella spores, which grow predominantly in the dung of large herbivores, virtually disappeared around 41,000 years ago.

This decline was followed by increased fire activity due to the absence of herbivores that would have consumed vegetation. At Lynch's Crater, these approaches increase researchers' confidence that a decline in dung fungi at approximately 40,000 years ago indicates an unprecedented drop in biomass of large herbivores. This change aligns with long-term drying and resource reduction, suggesting that human hunting might have contributed to the decline of these animals.

When humans spread across the continent, they likely utilized the available large herbivores for sustenance, though these prey were found in limited numbers and locations. Early foraging strategies were diverse, as shown by archaeological findings of small to medium-sized game remains. Various prey were hunted based on local availability, leading to adaptable hunting practices. In specific environments like desert areas, permanent lakes provided rich resources for both terrestrial and aquatic game. Fishing was conducted using tools like spears, nets, and hooks. Additionally, plant foods like yams and seeds supplemented the diet, though evidence of this is rare. Different regions had varying economic strategies and cultural practices, shaped by local environments and demographic histories.

Regional Traditions and Cultural Diversity

After colonizing different landscapes across Sahul, regional traditions of behavior and cultural practices emerged. Geographical variations in technology and symbols are evident from well-preserved stone artifact assemblages. Different regions showed distinct technological adaptations based on raw material availability and economic considerations. For instance, high-altitude wetland sites in New Guinea between 45,000 and 39,000 years ago focused on extracting and managing plant resources, using tools such as axes to clear forests and promote plant growth.

Regionality is also seen in bone point distribution. In the Pleistocene, bone points were prevalent in southern Australian assemblages, especially in upland Tasmanian sites. These points, possibly used as awls, were essential for crafting clothing in cold environments.

Furthermore, regional differences in cultural practices are evident in the use of symbols and ornamentation. Jewelry and painted art production differed across regions. Jewelry made of perforated shells or bones with mastic and ochre was primarily found in the northwestern part of the continent, indicating regional traditions in ornamentation. Ochre use for rock paintings also varied by region, with distinct expressions of symbolic activities between different areas.

These variations in technology, symbols, and cultural practices reflect the diversity of adaptations as human groups settled into different environments. The emergence of regional traditions was likely influenced by both geographical diversity and historical circumstances. This period of colonization and adaptation was characterized by regional differences and cultural evolution rather than a uniform and stable cultural landscape across Sahul.

Expansion into the Pacific

Settlement of the Bismarck Archipelago

By around 45,000 years before present, humans had migrated eastward into the Pacific, reaching the Bismarck Archipelago. They later reached the northern Solomon Islands by about 35,000 years ago. These islands share similarities with Wallacea in terms of limited terrestrial fauna due to geographical isolation.

In the Bismarck Archipelago, the Vitiaz Strait acted as a biogeographic barrier. Unlike the mainland, these islands had fewer terrestrial mammals and bird species. The strait limited the movement of land-based animals. As a result, the staples for the early populations in this region likely included fish, shellfish, marine creatures, and birds, alongside tropical plants.

Early archaeological sites such as Buang Merabak and Matenkupkum on New Ireland, occupied between 45,000 and 40,000 calibrated years before present, show evidence of marine resource exploitation. Cultural deposits at Matenkupkum indicate intermittent occupation from 35,000 to 20,000 years before present. These sites had a mix of marine shellfish remains, echinoderms, and some fish remains. However, evidence for specialized maritime subsistence and equipment is limited in the earliest stages of occupation.

Advances in Maritime Technology

Around 24,000 years ago, there's a noticeable change in maritime capacity in the Bismarck Archipelago. Obsidian and New Britain cuscus appear in New Ireland sites, indicating advancements in seafaring and trading across short distances. Evidence suggests that the people of the region relied on boats, mobility, and marine resources to sustain themselves on small islands.

By 32,000 years before present, Buka in the northern Solomon Islands was settled, requiring seafaring abilities for long-distance travel. Similarly, Manus Island was reached around 25,000 years before present. Although debates exist about the sophistication of watercraft, it's clear that over time, improvements in maritime technology enabled more advanced voyaging, including sailing against prevailing winds.

By 20,000 years ago, sites such as Matenkupkum in New Ireland, Papua New Guinea, suggest that people were introducing wild animals—such as wallabies and rats—into ecosystems naturally poor in such species. This represents an early form of human-mediated faunal translocation and demonstrates sophisticated understanding of island ecosystems and resource management.

Technology and Adaptation in Island Southeast Asia

In Pleistocene Philippines and Wallacean islands, early human technology is characterized by simple lithic assemblages of flakes and cores, often with low retouch. The 67,000-year-old Callao Cave site lacks stone artifacts and suggests a technology based on bamboo, bone, and antler. Many sites show low-density flake and core assemblages, possibly due to occasional cave use or use of perishable tools.

Bone artifacts provide insights into organic technology, such as notched bone projectiles and bone points for delicate tasks like drilling. Fishing tools like hooks and netting were practiced, and some sites have flaked shell tools, although they are underrepresented due to preservation issues. While stone tools are just one aspect of a broader repertoire, the few preserved examples highlight the early colonists' technological adaptability and sophistication.

Conclusion

The story of early human migration from Africa through India to Southeast Asia and beyond is one of the most remarkable chapters in human prehistory. The genetic, archaeological, and environmental evidence together paint a picture of courageous pioneers who developed sophisticated maritime technology, adapted to diverse and challenging environments, and established the foundation for the rich cultural and genetic diversity we see in these regions today.

The journey from the African continent to the distant shores of Sahul represents not just a geographical expansion but a profound testament to human ingenuity, resilience, and adaptability. The fact that these early migrants successfully navigated vast ocean barriers, colonized previously uninhabited continents, and established enduring cultural traditions speaks to the remarkable capabilities of our ancient ancestors.

As ongoing research continues to uncover new evidence and refine our understanding of these ancient migrations, we gain deeper appreciation for the complex tapestry of human history and the shared heritage that connects all of humanity. The story of human dispersal across Asia and Australasia remains a vibrant field of scientific inquiry, with each new discovery adding another piece to the puzzle of our collective past.

References

• 
  1.      Kivisild, T., Rootsi, S., Metspalu, M., Mastana, S., Kaldma, K., Parik, J., Metspalu, E., Adojaan, M., Tolk, H. V., Stepanov, V., Gölge, M., Usanga, E., Papiha, S. S., Cinnioğlu, C., King, R., Cavalli-Sforza, L., Underhill, P. A., & Villems, R. (2003). The Genetic Heritage of the Earliest Settlers Persists Both in Indian Tribal and Caste Populations. American Journal of Human Genetics, 72(2), 313–332.
• 2.      Palanichamy, M. G., Sun, C., Agrawal, S., Bandelt, H. J., Kong, Q. P., Khan, F., Wang, C. Y., Chaudhuri, T. K., Palla, V., & Zhang, Y. P. (2004). Phylogeny of Mitochondrial DNA Macrohaplogroup N in India, Based on Complete Sequencing: Implications for the Peopling of South Asia. American Journal of Human Genetics, 75(6), 966–978.
• 3.      Sun, C., Kong, Q. P., Palanichamy, M. G., Agrawal, S., Bandelt, H. J., Yao, Y. G., Khan, F., Zhu, C. L., Chaudhuri, T. K., & Zhang, Y. P. (2006). The Dazzling Array of Basal Branches in the mtDNA Macrohaplogroup M from India as Inferred from Complete Genomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 23(3), 683–690.
• 4.      Chandrasekar, A., Kumar, S., Sreenath, J., Sarkar, B. N., Urade, B. P., Mallick, S., Bandopadhyay, S. S., Barua, P., Barik, S. S., Basu, D., Kiran, U., Gangopadhyay, P., Sahani, R., Prasad, B. V., Gangopadhyay, S., & Lakshmi, G. R. (2009). Updating Phylogeny of Mitochondrial DNA Macrohaplogroup M in India: Dispersal of Modern Human in South Asian Corridor. PLoS ONE, 4(10), e7447.
• 5.      Marrero, P., Abu-Amero, K. K., Larruga, J. M., & Cabrera, V. M. (2016). Carriers of human mitochondrial DNA macrohaplogroup M colonized India from southeastern Asia. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 16, 246.
• 6.      Husson, L., Salles, T., Lebatard, A. E., Zerathe, S., Braucher, R., Noerwidi, S., Aribowo, S., Mallard, C., Carcaillet, J., Natawidjaja, D. H., Bourlès, D. L., & ASTER Team. (2022). Erectus on the move in SE Asia: converging evidences for an early migration to Java 1.8 Myr ago. Scientific Reports, 12, 19012.
• 7.      Demeter, F., Shackelford, L. L., Bacon, A. M., Duringer, P., Westaway, K., Sayavongkhamdy, T., Braga, J., Sichanthongtip, P., Khamdalavong, P., Ponche, J. L., Wang, H., Lundstrom, C., Patole-Edoumba, E., & Karpoff, A. M. (2012). Anatomically modern human in Southeast Asia (Laos) by 46 ka. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(36), 14375–14380.
• 8.      Mijares, A. S., Détroit, F., Piper, P., Grün, R., Bellwood, P., Aubert, M., Champion, G., Cuevas, N., De Leon, A., & Dizon, E. (2010). New evidence for a 67,000-year-old human presence at Callao Cave, Luzon, Philippines. Journal of Human Evolution, 59(1), 123–132.
• 9.      Détroit, F., Mijares, A. S., Corny, J., Daver, G., Zanolli, C., Dizon, E., Robles, E., Grün, R., & Piper, P. J. (2019). A new species of Homo from the Late Pleistocene of the Philippines. Nature, 568, 181–186.
• 10.  Barker, G., Barton, H., Bird, M., Daly, P., Datan, I., Dykes, A., Farr, L., Gilbertson, D., Harrisson, B., Hunt, C., Higham, T., Kealhofer, L., Krigbaum, J., Lewis, H., McLaren, S., Paz, V., Pike, A., Piper, P., Pyatt, B., Rabett, R., Reynolds, T., Rose, J., Rushworth, G., Stephens, M., Stringer, C., Thompson, J., & Turney, C. (2007). The 'human revolution' in lowland tropical Southeast Asia: the antiquity and behavior of anatomically modern humans at Niah Cave (Sarawak, Borneo). Journal of Human Evolution, 52(3), 243–261.
• 11.  Solihuddin, T. (2014). A Drowning Sunda Shelf Model during Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and Holocene: A Review. Indonesian Journal on Geoscience, 1(2), 99–110.
• 12.  Kealy, S., Louys, J., & O'Connor, S. (2018). Least-cost pathway models indicate northern human dispersal from Sunda to Sahul. Journal of Human Evolution, 125, 59–70.
• 13.  Bird, M. I., Beaman, R. J., Condie, S. A., Cooper, A., Ulm, S., & Veth, P. (2019). Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident. Scientific Reports, 9, 8220.
• 14.  McColl, H., Racimo, F., Vinner, L., Demeter, F., Gakuhari, T., Moreno-Mayar, J. V., van Driem, G., Gram Wilken, U., Seguin-Orlando, A., de la Fuente Castro, C., Wasef, S., Shoocongdej, R., Souksavatdy, V., Sayavongkhamdy, T., Saidin, M. M., Allentoft, M. E., Sato, T., Malaspinas, A. S., Aghakhanian, F. A., Korneliussen, T., Prohaska, A., Margaryan, A., de Barros Damgaard, P., Kaewsutthi, S., Lertrit, P., Nguyen, T. M. H., Hung, H. C., Minh Tran, T., Nghia Truong, H., Nguyen, G. H., Shahidan, S., Wiradnyana, K., Matsumae, H., Shigehara, N., Yoneda, M., Ishida, H., Masuyama, T., Yamada, Y., Tajima, A., Shibata, H., Toyoda, A., Hanihara, T., Nakagome, S., Deviese, T., Bacon, A. M., Duringer, P., Ponche, J. L., Shackelford, L., Patole-Edoumba, E., Nguyen, A. T., Bellina-Pryce, B., Galipaud, J. C., Kinaston, R., Buckley, H., Pottier, C., Rasmussen, S., Higham, T., Foley, R. A., Lahr, M. M., Orlando, L., Sikora, M., Phipps, M. E., Oota, H., Higham, C., Lambert, D. M., & Willerslev, E. (2018). The prehistoric peopling of Southeast Asia. Science, 361(6397), 88–92.
• 15.  Lipson, M., Cheronet, O., Mallick, S., Rohland, N., Oxenham, M., Pietrusewsky, M., Pryce, T. O., Willis, A., Matsumura, H., Buckley, H., Domett, K., Nguyen, G. H., Trinh, H. H., Kyaw, A. A., Win, T. T., Pradier, B., Broomandkhoshbacht, N., Candilio, F., Changmai, P., Fernandes, D., Ferry, M., Gamarra, B., Harney, E., Kampuansai, J., Kutanan, W., Michel, M., Novak, M., Oppenheimer, J., Sirak, K., Stewardson, K., Zhang, Z., Flegontov, P., Pinhasi, R., & Reich, D. (2018). Ancient genomes document multiple waves of migration in Southeast Asian prehistory. Science, 361(6397), 92–95.
• 16.  Carlhoff, S., Duli, A., Nägele, K., Nur, M., Skov, L., Sumantri, I., Oktaviana, A. A., Hakim, B., Burhan, B., Syahdar, F. A., McGahan, D. P., Bulbeck, D., Perston, Y. L., Newman, K., Saiful, A. M., Ririmasse, M., Chia, S., Hasanuddin, Pulubuhu, D. A. T., Suryatman, Supriadi, Jeong, C., Peter, B. M., Prüfer, K., Powell, A., Krause, J., Posth, C., & Brumm, A. (2021). Genome of a middle Holocene hunter-gatherer from Wallacea. Nature, 596, 543–547.
• 17.  Ko, A. M. S., Chen, C. Y., Fu, Q., Delfin, F., Li, M., Chiu, H. L., Stoneking, M., & Ko, Y. C. (2014). Early Austronesians: Into and Out Of Taiwan. American Journal of Human Genetics, 94(3), 426–436.
• 18.  Teixeira, J. C., & Cooper, A. (2019). Using hominin introgression to trace modern human dispersals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(31), 15327–15332.
• 19.  Choin, J., Mendoza-Revilla, J., Arauna, L. R., Cuadros-Espinoza, S., Cassar, O., Larena, M., Ko, A. M. S., Harmant, C., Laurent, R., Verdu, P., Laval, G., Boland, A., Olaso, R., Deleuze, J. F., Valentin, F., Ko, Y. C., Jakobsson, M., Gessain, A., Excoffier, L., Stoneking, M., Patin, E., & Quintana-Murci, L. (2022). Chronology of natural selection in Oceanian genomes. iScience, 25(7), 104583.
• 20.  Clarkson, C., Jacobs, Z., Marwick, B., Fullagar, R., Wallis, L., Smith, M., Roberts, R. G., Hayes, E., Lowe, K., Carah, X., Florin, S. A., McNeil, J., Cox, D., Arnold, L. J., Hua, Q., Huntley, J., Brand, H. E. A., Manne, T., Fairbairn, A., Shulmeister, J., Lyle, L., Salinas, M., Page, M., Connell, K., Park, G., Norman, K., Murphy, T., & Pardoe, C. (2017). Human occupation of northern Australia by 65,000 years ago. Nature, 547, 306–310.
• 21.  Heupink, T. H., Subramanian, S., Wright, J. L., Endicott, P., Westaway, M. C., Huynen, L., Parson, W., Millar, C. D., Willerslev, E., & Lambert, D. M. (2016). Ancient mtDNA sequences from the First Australians revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(25), 6892–6897.
• 22.  Rule, S., Brook, B. W., Haberle, S. G., Turney, C. S. M., Kershaw, A. P., & Johnson, C. N. (2012). The Aftermath of Megafaunal Extinction: Ecosystem Transformation in Pleistocene Australia. Science, 335(6075), 1483–1486.
• 23.  Johnson, C. N., Rule, S., Haberle, S. G., Kershaw, A. P., McKenzie, G. M., & Brook, B. W. (2016). Geographic variation in the ecological effects of extinction of Australia's Pleistocene megafauna. Ecography, 39(2), 109–116.
• 24.  Leavesley, M. G., Bird, M. I., Fifield, L. K., Hausladen, P. A., Santos, G. M., & di Tada, M. L. (2002). Buang Merabak: Early Evidence for Human Occupation in the Bismarck Archipelago, Papua New Guinea. Australian Archaeology, 54, 55–57.
• 25.  O'Connor, S., Ono, R., & Clarkson, C. (2011). Pelagic Fishing at 42,000 Years Before the Present and the Maritime Skills of Modern Humans. Science, 334(6059), 1117–1121.